Solution
Integration and Middleware
An architecture where links between systems do not scatter through the application.
Integration usually gets added as needs arise; a few years later nobody knows which service is called from where, and changing one provider opens half the system. In our setup every outward link is gathered into one module. The rest of the application does not know those services exist, so when a provider changes, one place changes.
Connection layer
- Single entry point, service contracts and versioning
- Retry, timeout and circuit-breaker behaviour
- Queueing and deferred processing
- Full request/response logging and error tracking
- Provider swaps handled in one place
Enterprise systems
- Logo, Netsis, Mikro, SAP and bespoke ERP connections
- Journal entry export to accounting packages
- Single sign-on via Active Directory / LDAP
- Database-level reads from legacy systems
Statutory and financial
- E-invoice, e-archive, e-waybill and e-ledger providers
- Bank statement import and bulk payment files
- Payment gateways, providers and instalment rules
- Exchange rate services
Operational services
- Courier and carrier services
- SMS, email and push notification providers
- Mapping, address and routing services
- Marketplaces and e-commerce platforms
- AI model providers, behind one service layer
- REST, SOAP, GraphQL and file-based transfer (SFTP, CSV, XML)
- Webhooks and event-driven triggers
- Message queues for asynchronous processing
- Scheduled batch transfer
- 01The same data is keyed into two systems
- 02When a service changes, you do not know how many places in the code will open
- 03Integration failures surface as customer complaints
- 04You learn in the morning whether the overnight transfer ran
- 05A provider contract is ending and nobody can cost the exit
- 01What does the other system’s API actually give you?
- Documentation and real behaviour are often different. We measure integration feasibility during the technical assessment and define an alternative transfer method for whatever the API cannot do.
- 02Which way does data flow, and which side tells the truth?
- Every field needs exactly one owner. Designs where two systems can update the same field inevitably produce conflicts and lost data.
- 03Real time or batch?
- Real time is not always better and can overload the other system. We decide field by field: stock live, statements hourly, journal entries daily.
İDDMİB — Istanbul Ferrous & Non-Ferrous Metals Exporters' Association
Website and mobile app for the trade body overseeing roughly $13B in annual export volume — built on Laravel with a secure, pixel-perfect member experience.
2024 →Sümerli Tel — Dealer Management Platform
A dealer portal where distributors track debts and payments, place orders, and pay securely — with real-time reporting for the business behind it.
2024 →Turkish Aluminium 365 — B2B Industry Network
A B2B social platform for the aluminium industry — companies connect, schedule meetings, and share capacity and product listings in one place.
2024 →Mulcol — AR Product Catalog
An interactive AR catalog letting customers explore products in 3D — bridging physical and digital product presentation.
2018 →- Will you take integration work on its own?
- Yes. Keep your existing systems and have us build the links between them. Even then we start with a feasibility study.
- How do we know if an integration breaks?
- Monitoring is in scope: alerts fire when the failure threshold is crossed, every request and response is logged, and failed jobs can be retried.
Let’s scope it together.
We do not quote a fixed price for undefined scope. We review your existing system and processes on site, then deliver the roadmap and a fixed-price proposal.