Solution
AI Layer
This is the layer that takes AI out of the demo and into production.
Most AI projects die in the demo. The model is not the reason. Where nobody has defined how it connects to company data, what it may not say, how its output is measured and how access is recorded, there is nothing left to turn a working demonstration into a system somebody signs for. We build this layer as the answer to those questions. The model provider can change; the connection, the limits, the measurement and the record stay with you.
Connection and access
- MCP server: company systems exposed to the model through one standard interface
- Tool definitions: every operation the model may call, named individually
- Authorisation boundary: which role reaches which data and which action
- Read-only and write-capable tools kept apart
- Authentication and session-scoped access
- Rate limiting and abuse protection
Grounding in your own data
- Ingestion: contracts, procedures, technical documents and record sources
- Chunking and embedding scheme
- Semantic and keyword search working together
- Citation: every answer states the document it came from
- Refresh flow: the index updates when a document changes
- Access rights enforced in the retrieval layer as well
Agents and execution
- Multi-step task execution with an explicit plan
- Tool use: opening a record, creating an order, producing a report
- Steps that require human approval, named upfront
- Rollback and compensating actions
- Queueing, retries and failure handling
- Progress reporting on long-running work
Policy and limits
- Forbidden topics and forbidden forms of steering
- An obligation to speak only from the data supplied
- Missing information written as missing rather than invented
- Output validation: shape, range and business rules
- Personal data masking and confidential field filtering
- Fallback behaviour when a limit is hit
Evaluation and quality
- An eval set built from real questions, held fixed
- Regression checks so a prompt or model change cannot lower quality
- Human review and labelling flow
- A/B comparison and per-version scoring
- An acceptance threshold below which nothing ships
- Failed outputs collected and folded back into the test set
Observability and cost
- Traces: which question, which context, which tool, which answer
- Audit record and retention period
- Token and cost tracking, cost per unit of work
- Latency measurement and identification of slow steps
- Usage reporting by team, user and process
- Alert thresholds on cost, error rate and latency
Control surface
- The system prompt edited and versioned from the admin panel
- Version history and rollback
- Model routing: a different model per task, balancing cost and quality
- Failover to a secondary model when a provider degrades
- Knowledge base maintained by editors
- A staging environment for trying a change before it ships
Data protection and compliance
- Data excluded from model training
- Data residency: where a request goes and where it is stored
- Processing inventory under KVKK and GDPR
- A self-hosted model option
- Personal data retention and deletion periods
- Confidentiality terms and sub-processor transparency
- ERP and accounting systems
- CRM and service desk
- Document management and file stores
- Data warehouse and reporting tools
- Email, calendar and messaging
- Identity providers and authorisation systems
- 01The AI pilot worked and never reached production
- 02The model does not know your own documents and answers generically
- 03Nobody measures whether the output is correct
- 04There is no record of who reached what
- 05Monthly model cost cannot be predicted
- 06Legal and IT are asking where the data goes
- 07Changing a prompt means waiting for a developer
- 01Where will the model run?
- Through a provider or on your own servers. That one decision sets cost, latency and data residency at the same time, and it is usually the first question an enterprise buyer asks.
- 02Will the model only read, or also act?
- Reading is comparatively simple. The moment the model is to open a record or start a transaction, authorisation, approval and rollback design become most of the work.
- 03Which source counts as the truth?
- In a company where the same fact sits differently in two places, the model will produce two different answers. The hierarchy of sources has to be settled before grounding is built.
- 04How will accuracy be measured?
- Without measurement, a quality discussion becomes a matter of opinion. An evaluation set is built at the start and every version is scored against it.
- 05Which steps need a human?
- Every irreversible action — money moving, something sent outside, a deletion — needs approval. That boundary is written at the start of the project.
Sümerli Tel — Dealer Management Platform
A dealer portal where distributors track debts and payments, place orders, and pay securely — with real-time reporting for the business behind it.
2024 →Halka Arz Haber — AI-Assisted IPO Tracker
An IPO tracker for Borsa İstanbul whose evaluations are drafted by AI from supplied data — no invented figures, no buy or sell steer.
2024 →Turkish Aluminium 365 — B2B Industry Network
A B2B social platform for the aluminium industry — companies connect, schedule meetings, and share capacity and product listings in one place.
2024 →Borsatalk — Stock Market Community
A social platform where investors and traders share market insights and discuss trends together in real time.
2024 →- What is MCP and what does it give us?
- MCP is an open standard for connecting AI clients to external systems. Instead of writing a separate integration per tool, it exposes your systems through one standard interface, and authorisation boundaries are defined at that interface. In practice it means every operation the model can reach is named individually and can be audited.
- Does our data go into training the model?
- Not in what we build. Enterprise provider agreements exclude data from training, and we put that in writing at the start of the project. Where data must not leave your premises at all, we set up a self-hosted model instead.
- What if the model produces something wrong?
- No method removes that entirely; a structure that reduces and catches it does exist. Answers are produced only from supplied data, sources are cited, missing information is stated as missing, output passes shape and business-rule validation, and irreversible actions require human approval. The evaluation set catches regressions before a version ships.
- Do we have to replace our ERP?
- No. This layer sits on top of existing systems and connects to them. Its entire purpose is to make working systems reachable without replacing them.
- How is it costed?
- Two lines: development, and per-use model cost. A pilot at your real volume produces a monthly estimate. In a self-hosted setup the second line becomes hardware and operations instead.
- Where should we start?
- With a single process. An AI readiness assessment sets out in writing which process is suitable, whether the data you hold is sufficient, and what you should not attempt.
Let’s scope it together.
We do not quote a fixed price for undefined scope. We review your existing system and processes on site, then deliver the roadmap and a fixed-price proposal.